Grayscale Investments has achieved a significant legal triumph in a lawsuit against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding the approval of a spot Bitcoin Exchange Traded Fund (ETF). This victory is seen as a milestone, with the entire cryptocurrency industry rejoicing. The court's unanimous 3:0 ruling mandates the SEC to reassess Grayscale's request to transform its BTC Trust (GBTC) into an ETF. The court found the SEC's denial of Grayscale's proposal to be "arbitrary and capricious" because it failed to elucidate the differing treatment of similar products. Currently, GBTC units can only be created but not redeemed, leading to a substantial price gap between NAV and the market price. Converting GBTC into an ETF would permit redemption for underlying Bitcoin, closing this arbitrage gap. Historically, the SEC rejected spot Bitcoin ETF applications due to concerns over market integrity and surveillance-sharing agreements. However, the court ruled that these concerns were invalid for Grayscale's application, noting that the SEC had already approved futures Bitcoin ETFs with identical agreements. The court's decision implies that the SEC can no longer use "market integrity" as a pretext to reject spot Bitcoin ETF applications. However, it's essential to recognize that Grayscale's ETF application hasn't been approved yet; the court has simply instructed the SEC to revisit it. Given the SEC's historical skepticism toward crypto, there's a possibility of further denials. Notably, many major asset managers have sought approval for spot Bitcoin ETFs, increasing the pressure on the SEC to grant one. Initial rulings for five of these ETFs are expected shortly, making this a crucial moment for the cryptocurrency industry. See Grayscale Investments Chief Legal Officer Craig Salm discuss the next steps after a federal court ruled the SEC must review its rejection in the link below.
SDNY District Judge Failla has dismissed a class action complaint against Uniswap Labs, its control persons, and various investors and venture capital firms. The complaint had alleged that tokens traded on the DeFi platform were securities, UNI governance token was a security, and Uniswap Labs acted as an unregistered broker-dealer due to its smart contracts and web interface. The court's decision echoed a similar outcome in a class action against Coinbase, avoiding addressing federal securities law issues concerning digital assets. The court's stance was summed up as not extending federal securities laws to cover the alleged conduct, suggesting that Congress should handle these concerns. Key points from the dismissal include the classification of ETH as a commodity, the rejection of liability for code developers in cases of misuse by third parties, and the dismissal of Section 12 claims under the Securities Act of 1933 due to Uniswap's non-custodial nature and lack of evidence of solicitation. The Judge drew a parallel between the Uniswap case and holding application platforms like Venmo or Zelle responsible for facilitating illegal fund transfers for drugs or other illegal activity. This dismissal potentially sets a favorable precedent, particularly for Tornado Cash founders who recently faced U.S. indictment in a similar context. See the opinion in the link below.
The SEC Chair's aggressive enforcement strategy is showing cracks, as increasing case volume with limited resources leads to lower-quality cases. Court losses and settlements have become a recurring pattern, hindering the regulatory agenda's progress. Additionally, this approach is eroding staff morale, impacting public servants who joined to serve the SEC's mission, not just enforce at any cost. Attrition rates are soaring, with the SEC experiencing its highest in a decade at 6.4%, and attorneys leaving at 8.4%. Senior officers, crucial to the agency's functioning, have a staggering attrition rate of 20.8%. Communication issues are also emerging, with over half of SEC staff feeling that information sharing is inadequate, describing it as "siloed" and "not timely." It remains to be seen if Congress will take notice of these concerning developments and throttle back the regulation by enforcement of the crypto industry. See the Inspector General's report in the link below.
The SEC has initiated its first enforcement action related to non-fungible tokens (NFTs), which involved a dissenting opinion due to disagreements about the application of the Howey analysis. The case involved Impact Theory selling nearly $30 million worth of NFTs with promises of value appreciation, but these NFTs didn't grant ownership in the company or generate dividends. The SEC charged Impact Theory with an unregistered securities offering, though no fraud charges were filed. Despite concerns about the NFT market's hype and lack of clarity for purchasers, this alone wasn't seen as sufficient to warrant SEC jurisdiction. The case raises complex questions about how to categorize NFTs, the role of securities laws, and potential regulatory guidance in this emerging field. See remarks directly from two Commissioners who disagreed with Gensler.
Discover the full story behind how we’re shaping the future of recruitment in digital assets and fund administration
HARRINGTON STARR FINTECH FOCUS TV
A clip of Matthew Homer on the evolving journey towards regulatory equilibrium in Digital Assets. Watch the full episode here.
HARRINGTON STARR FINTECH FOCUS TV
A clip of Jack McDonald on the current appetite of TradFi talent migrating to the DeFi space. Watch the full episode here.
The content and information aggregated in this newsletter is publicly available and shared by us to keep our clients and professional network up to date with digital asset / crypto industry news, exhibitions and events. We do not use, repurpose or represent authority over any licensed images or content and have no conflicts of interest with regards to the production of this bulletin or the shared content herein. This is provided as an optional newsletter that you may unsubscribe from. We do not share any of your contact details with any other company or institution without prior consent.
Standard Custody & Trust Co.
PolySign, Inc., 650 5th Ave, 14th Floor, New York, NY, 10019
